![]() As more trucks get added to a larger incident, more roles will be delegated to other officers and the role will probably be handed to a more qualified individual. Only in the largest and most complex operations would the full ICS organization be staffed. Conversely, as an incident scales down, roles will be merged back up the tree until there is just the IC role remaining. For example, a single fire truck at a dumpster fire will have the officer filling the role of Incident Commander (IC) with no other roles required. In most cases, very few positions within the command structure will need to be activated. For example, Incident Command is established by the first arriving unit. Only positions that are required at the time should be established. Command is established in a top-down fashion, with the most important and authoritative positions established first. Objectives are accomplished by first outlining strategies (general plans of action), then determining appropriate tactics (how the strategy will be executed) for the chosen strategy.įlexible and Modular Organization - The ICS structure is organized in such a way as to expand and contract as needed by the incident scope, resources and hazards. Objectives are ranked by priority should be as specific as possible must be attainable and if possible given a working time-frame. Management by Objective - Incidents are managed by aiming towards specific objectives. The use of common terminology is most evident in the titles of command roles, such as Incident Commander, Safety Officer or Operations Section Chief. This concept is fundamental to the ICS chain of command structure.Ĭommon Terminology - When different organizations are required to work together, the use of common terminology is an essential element in team cohesion and communications, both internally and with other organizations responding to the incident. ICS promotes the use of a common terminology and has an associated glossary of terms that help bring consistency to position titles, the description of resources and how they can be organized, the type and names of incident facilities, and a host of other subjects. This eliminates the potential for individuals to receive conflicting orders from a variety of supervisors, thus increasing accountability, preventing freelancing, improving the flow of information, helping with the coordination of operational efforts, and enhancing operational safety. Unity of Command - Each individual participating in the operation reports to only one supervisor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |